Arizona agents and brokers: As the new year begins, several important updates to Arizona Administrative Code Title 4, Chapter 28 (R4-28) are now in effect. These changes are not cosmetic. They directly impact how we advertise, how compensation relationships are disclosed, and how the public evaluates our professionalism.
This is a concise, broker-minded guide to the beginning-of-year R4-28 changes that matter most: advertising transparency and referral/compensation disclosure timing—what changed, why ADRE made the change, and what you should do now.
Key takeaways (beginning-of-year):
Jump to: Why ADRE tightened R4-28 · R4-28-502 Advertising · R4-28-701 Referrals/Comp · Other updates · Action plan · Glossary · FAQ
ADRE’s job is consumer protection. As marketing moved to social media, the rules had to get clearer about three things: who represents whom, which brokerages are financially involved, and who is accountable for the advertising consumers see.
Authoritative ADRE resource: ADRE — Laws, Rules, Policy Statements
Download the current ADRE Law Book (PDF): Dec 2025 ADRE Law Book
It has become common for agents to advertise listings from other brokerages online with little or no broker attribution—photos, price, “DM me,” and that’s it. Under Arizona law, that is advertising, and advertising must meet specific standards.
What the rule requires: R4-28-502 requires that advertising identify, in a clear and prominent manner, the employing broker’s legal name or DBA as shown on the broker’s license. For the official consolidated rules, use ADRE’s R4-28 PDF: Arizona Administrative Code — R4-28 (ADRE PDF).
The beginning-of-year change that will surprise many agents is timing. R4-28-701 requires certain compensation disclosures be made at least three calendar days before closing. This is about transparency early enough to matter—not at the finish line.
What must be disclosed: the name of each employing broker who represents a party and who will receive compensation from the transaction (see the official R4-28 PDF above).
If an employing broker will receive compensation because of a referral arrangement, that broker’s identity must be disclosed in writing when required. The amount is not the point here—the rule focuses on who is involved.
The compliance core is broker identification. The rule is focused on the employing broker being identified clearly and prominently. Naming the agent can be helpful, but it does not replace broker identification.
Yes, the compliance core is broker identification, even if it is your listing. The rule is focused on the employing broker being identified clearly and prominently.
If an employing broker will receive compensation from the transaction because of a referral arrangement, that broker’s identity can be part of what must be disclosed in writing when the rule applies. Treat referrals as a timeline item—not a last-minute closing detail.
The rule is about identity—who is involved—not necessarily the dollar amount. Build your process around disclosing the broker(s) involved and meeting the timing requirement.
Compliance note: This article is educational and not legal advice. For transaction-specific interpretation, consult ADRE publications, your broker’s written policies, and qualified legal counsel.